You are not going to find too many people talking about this. I didn’t hear any candidates mention it during the campaign season.
The stats say 1 in 3 Native women will be raped or sexually assaulted in their lifetime. That sounds alarming. It sounds like it is too high to be true, but on this, I’ll back these stats up. Many of the people I know, and some of whom are my closest friends have been victimized in this way. It makes me sad, and it breaks my heart. Please take time to watch this video.
Several things can be done to improve this situation in my opinion.
1. We need jurisdiction. We need to be able to prosecute these crimes. Right now If a non-Indian rapes an Osage woman on trust property, the maximum amount that person can go to jail via tribal jurisdiction is 1 year. They only other remedy is through federal court which hears a small percentage of cases. That is embarrassing.
2. We need forensic SANE rape units at our IHS. Without properly gathered evidence none of these perpetrators will ever get caught.
3. We need to educate our people about their rights as victims or persons considered at risk
4. We need to take responsibility within our own community to ensure that our own people who are subjected to this violence.
This effects the social, mental and physical well being of our community. These are the folks that seek jobs here. They are our neighbors. They are our friends. Our cousins. Our brothers and sisters. Please exert pressure on this new congress and those that still have 2 years left in their terms to address this problem.
Some of you know that I just had a daughter about 2 weeks back. By the time she is 18, I don’t want to still be hearing about how 1 in 3 Native women will be raped in their lifetime.
Loading ...
Excellent article on an important issue for women everywhere. Spreading awareness to our own people starts with creating dialogue like this. I will share it with others. Pila Maya
There was something on this on the show VANGAURD on the CURRENT channel. If you have this channel you should try to catch it.
Actually Louis and Margo both spoke to this issue during their campaigns.
Olivia, I’m glad they did. I hope that someone picks up the cause on their behalf within the ranks of our elected officials.
[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by . said: [...]
While I did not speak of “rape” directly, one of the objectives in my campaign platform (www.amandaproctor.com) is to build a detention center for tribal member offenders to include some therapeutic components. I was a public defender for two tribes, and I am well aware of the jurisdictional voids that arise in the criminal arena. There is not one jail in the state of Oklahoma that was designed to serve adult inmates who are sentenced by tribal court systems, despite the fact that Department of Justice grants are available for planning and constructing such facilities. Without a tribal detention center, there is little hope of deterring nor rehabilitating tribal offenders.
Also, tribal courts unfortunately cannot exercise criminal jurisdiction over non-Indians pursuant to United States Supreme Court decisional law (the Oliphant case). Tribes can impose civil remedies (like civil fines and forfeiture), but they cannot bring a criminal prosecution against a non-Indian under any circumstance.
Is there a legislative fix so that we can alter a situation from “Laws without consequences are just mere suggestions” on the U.S. side of the equation? Or is that like asking someone to walk on water?
In these detention facilities are offenders allowed to be sentenced past 1 year?
The detention facilities could only operate within the parameters of the Oliphant case (no criminal jurisdiction over non-Indians) and the Indian Civil Rights Act (max tribal penalty set at $5,000 fine and/or 1 year incarceration per offense).
However, as I stated in the previous post, there is NO adult tribal jail in the State of Oklahoma. Tribes must contract with the county governments to provide detention services — sometimes the counties play hardball and sometimes they won’t deal with the tribes at all. I know that the Ponca tribe was forced to take its prisoners to the panhandle because Kay and Pawnee counties would no longer take Ponca defendants. When the BIA provides direct law enforcement services to tribes, those prisoners with sentences of 30 days or longer are sent to Colorado or North Dakota and then released into those states without transportation back home. In all cases, the prisoners get NO therapy, education or other services. I understand that, if a tribe were to develop a prison in Oklahoma, the BIA would pay just to reserve beds, whether the beds were used or not. This is a no brainer for public service and economic development, in my opinion.
Any fix would have to occur at the Congressional level, although there is some pressure that could be applied to the state and federal prosecutorial authorities with criminal jurisdiction over the non-Indians. I believe that the Department of Justice is creating and/or beefing up Indian country crimes units throughout the country to address this issue. We’ll just have to keep monitoring their progress.
The reason I ask is because during my involvement during the 2008 DNC Native Policy platform in Denver, this was a hot topic. The senators, representatives and interior dept officials made it sound like there were legislative riders that were being drafted at that time or that “work” was being done on it. They were well versed in the facts of the problem and the structure which provides for non-enforcement. This should be a hot button travesty our DC reps could do something about… oh yea I forgot.. we have the worst Senators in the country…
I am full agreement with you on the therapy and rehabilitation. There is no point in letting these individuals back out if they remain in the same state as when they came in.
Ryan, this was by far, the most personally impactful issue you have covered on this website. I am involved in a Christ-centered recovery program, being the reason this was so relevant to me. Obviously any evidenciary support I would have is a no-go due to confidentiality. I will say this, a lot of these individuals go on with their lives knowing nothing can be done. Those experiences fester inside of them unaddressed and never defended. Under many of the addictions, compulsive behaviors, and recycling of violence/sexual violence, these specific offenses exist propelling the symptoms aforementioned. Even though these individuals tell themselves that they can ignore the experience and move on; the truth is, they are stuck in that place and time. This issue affects more than just young women being raped and/or assaulted. It affects all of us. It doesn’t just happen with the Lakotah people.
So where do we go from here? Amanda has covered her expertise on what exists out there as far as justice goes. But there is more than that we can push for. What about addressing the youth? What about teaching young men to respect women at an early age? And here is the real goal setter…and I say this from my own life experience to liberate others…What about teaching our people that it is okay to come forward to someone and reveal the hurt before it becomes a hang-up?
Thank you Ryan. Once again, thank you brother.
It’s sad that so many people, men and women, blame the girls for being victimized. I know some even go as far as to say they deserve it cuz they were out drinking. There’s no gray area when you are talking about rape. Rape is rape I don’t care what the situation. For anyone who has been raped and they are reading this, it was not your fault and never let anyone make you feel like it is. Never be ashamed, the rapists are the ones who should be ashamed.
As for the statistics that show the alarming rate of rapes on the reservation. There are a lot of theories that suggest why there are so many rapes. Alcohol, drugs, the parents never being there to guide, etc. One that stuck out to me was the boarding schools. I watched another special on boarding schools. Forgot what it was called but it was a dvd. Anyway, they said that back when our children were forced to go to boarding schools the teachers and other adults there were preying on the children. Raping them. When the children got older they brutalized other young Native children and so on. When the children went home they took this home with them to the reservations. Just one theory. Not saying that this is the whole reason but I believe it’s a factor on why we have so many on the reservations, because a lot of victimizers were victims theirselves. But this is just one theory.
Amanda is right on the amount of grants available to tribes to build such facilities but many tribes aren’t applying for those funds. Like many other people, tribal people aren’t always real eager to have such a facility in their own back yard. Its also unfortunate that we have such jurisdictional gaps. It attracts criminals to Indian Country because they are less likely to get prosecuted. I wish there were a more fair system in place to protect us. If I go to Missouri and break the law I am subject to the laws of that state. I wish it were the same in prosecuting non Indians who commit crimes in Indian Country.
Hello,
We have been hearing reports that there are many people who did not receive their requested absentee ballots or, people received an absentee ballot but never requested one. If this has happened to you, or someone you know, and you want the Osage people to know about it, please contact us at (918) 287-5669 or e-mail me at [email protected].
Shannon Shaw
Osage News
Interim Editor
Ryan, could you cite your statistics and sources please? I would like to see the origin of your 1 in 3 statistic. Thank you.
The FBI reported 90,427 rapes in 2007. Your picture above says 683,000 per year.
http://www.fbi.gov/ucr/cius2007/data/table_01.html
[...] Rape On the Reservation” which airs on Current TV. To read Ryan’s article click here. I ask that you also take some time and watch the documentary below. It is really [...]
It was pulled from this study.
The National Women’s Study (NWS), found that approximately 13% of adult women had been victims of completed rape during their lifetime (Kilpatrick, Edmunds, & Seymour, 1992; Resnick, Kilpatrick, Dansky, Saunders, & Best, 1993). During the year between interviews, 0.6% of adult women, or an estimated 683,000 women were victims of rape (Kilpatrick et al., 1992). In the two years between the first and third interviews, 1.2% of the adult participants in the NWS were raped. The results: an estimated 1.1 million women were raped in the United States during this two-year period (Kilpatrick, Resnick, Saunders, Best, 1997).
If you want additional reading and stats along with sources I am copying and pasting the statistics. Please keep in mind these are general population statistics and not specific to American Indian populations in the United States which are much higher.
Rape and Sexual Assault
Dean G. Kilpatrick, Ph.D.
National Violence Against Women Prevention Research Center
Medical University of South Carolina
Rape is the most underreported crime in America. Significant changes to improve the treatment of sexual assault victims have occurred in the last two decades. The impact of reforms, led by the women’s movement, can be seen in the legal, mental health, medical, and victim services arenas.
During the 1970s, the first rape crisis center was established. The treatment of victims in the criminal justice system was questioned, and hundreds of laws were passed to protect rape victims in the courts. Medical protocols have been developed and widely accepted. The mental health impact of rape is well documented in the literature, and the practices of mental health professionals have improved.
Although the treatment of rape victims today is vastly different from three decades ago, many victims still do not receive the assistance and treatment they need.
Statistical Overview
Obtaining an accurate measurement of rape and other types of sexual assault is a challenge. Determining the scope and nature of rape and other types of sexual assault depends on how these crimes are defined and measured. It is important to note that statistics are derived from different sources employing different practices to gather information.
In 1997, there were 96,122 reported forcible rapes. (Federal Bureau of Investigation. (released November 22, 1998). Crime in the United States, Uniform Crime Reports, 1997, p.26. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.)
An estimated 70 of every 100,000 females in the country were reported rape victims in 1997, a decrease 1% from 1996 13% from 1993. (Ibid.)
1997 National Crime Victimization Survey, which includes both reported and unreported crimes, found that despite a decline of 7% in the nation’s crime rate in 1997, rates of rape and sexual assault did not decline. (Bureau of Justice Statistics. (1998, December). National Crime Victimization Survey. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.)
The National Violence Against Women Survey, the first national study on stalking, found that in the 12 months preceding the study, 0.3 percent of all women surveyed experienced a completed or attempted rape, and 1.9 percent experienced a physical assault. (Violence Against Women Grants Office. (1998, July). Stalking and Domestic Violence: Third Annual Report to Congress Under the Violence Against Women Act, p.7. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.)
The National Women’s Study (NWS), found that approximately 13% of adult women had been victims of completed rape during their lifetime (Kilpatrick, Edmunds, & Seymour, 1992; Resnick, Kilpatrick, Dansky, Saunders, & Best, 1993). During the year between interviews, 0.6% of adult women, or an estimated 683,000 women were victims of rape (Kilpatrick et al., 1992). In the two years between the first and third interviews, 1.2% of the adult participants in the NWS were raped. The results: an estimated 1.1 million women were raped in the United States during this two-year period (Kilpatrick, Resnick, Saunders, Best, 1997).
Using a definition of rape that includes forced vaginal, oral, and anal sex, the National Violence Against Women Survey found that 1 of 6 U.S. Women and 1 of 33 U.S. men has experienced an attempted or completed rape as a child and/or adult. According to estimates, approximately 1.5 million women and 834,700 men are raped and/or physically assaulted annually by an intimate partner in the United States. (Tjaden, P. & Thoennes, N. (1998, November). A Prevalence, Incidence, and Consequences of Violence Against Women: Findings From the National Violence Against Women Survey, @ p. 2 & 5. Research in Brief. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice, U.S. Department of Justice.)
In 1996, more than two-thirds of rape/sexual assaults committed in the nation remained unreported. (Ringel, C. (1997, November). Criminal Victimization in 1996, Changes 1995-1996 with Trends 1993-1996, NCJ-165812, p.3. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics, U.S. Department of Justice.)
The National Survey of Adolescents (NSA), a National Institute of Justice funded study of national household probability sample of 4,023 adolescents age 12-17, found that 8.1% of U.S. adolescents had been victims of at least one sexual assault (Kilpatrick & Saunders, 1997; Kilpatrick, Acierno, Saunders, Resnick, Best, & Schnurr, 2000). This indicates that an estimated 1.8 million 12 to 17 year olds have been sexually assaulted
More than 52 percent of all rape/sexual assault victims were females younger than 25. (Perkins, C. (1997, September). Age Patterns of Victims of Serious Crimes, NCJ-162031, p.1. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics, U.S. Department of Justice.)
Women who suffered physical injury in addition to the injury suffered from the rape or sexual assault reported 37% of those crimes, while only 22% of rapes and sexual assaults without an additional physical injury were reported. (Craven, D. (1994.) A Sex Differences in Violent Victimization, @ NCJ-164508, p.5. Bureau of Justice Statistics, Special Report. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice).
Introduction
Although rape has occurred throughout history, the birth of the anti-rape movement in the US occurred only in the early 1970s. In 1972, the first rape crisis centers were established in San Francisco, CA (Bay Area Women Against Rape) and Washington, D.C. These grass roots centers grew out of the women’s movement. They recognized that rape was an all-too-common part of women’s lives and that it had a devastating impact on health and freedom. The goals of centers were to educate society about rape and rape-prevention and to improve the treatment of victims.
In the nearly three decades since its birth, the anti-rape movement has accomplished many of its goals. Major accomplishments include:
Widespread reform of rape statutes and other legislation.
Improvements in the way criminal justice officials treat victims.
A better understanding of the scope and impact of rape.
Improved medical and mental health services.
Better funding for rape crisis centers and others who assist victims.
Despite this progress, there is much to be done. The fact that well over a million Americans of all ages are raped each year suggests that efforts to prevent rape have not been entirely successful.
Most rape cases go unreported (Kilpatrick, Edmunds, & Seymour, 1992; Crowell & Burges, 1996; Ringel, 1996). In turn, those cases are never investigated or prosecuted. Despite vast improvements in the investigation and prosecution of rape, more are needed. Too few victims who sustain rape-related mental or physical health problems obtain effective treatment.
This page will address the following issues:
Defining rape and other types of sexual assault
The scope and mental health effects of rape
Victims’ concerns
Improving cooperation from victims
Improving the way criminal justice officials and victim assistance providers
Improving the investigation and prosecution of rape cases
Evolution of the Definition of Sexual Assault and Rape
Several authors have observed (e.g. Bourque, 1989; Estrich, 1987; Koss, 1993 ) that many people still believe that rape occurs only when a stranger attacks an adult woman using overwhelming force. Using this definition, boys or men cannot be raped; girls and adolescents cannot be raped; no one can be raped by someone they know; and forced oral or anal sex does not constitute rape. Thus, attempts to discuss the topic are often frustrating because many people define rape differently.
Before the 1960s, the legal definition of rape was generally a common law definition used throughout the United States that defined rape as “A carnal knowledge of a women not one’s wife by force or against her will.”
In 1962, the United States Model Penal Code (MPC) was established and updated the definition of rape. The MPC defined rape as ” A man who has sexual intercourse with a female not his wife is guilty of rape if . . . he compels her to submit by force or threat of force or threat of imminent death, serious bodily injury, extreme pain, or Kidnapping” (Epstein & Langenbahn, 1994, p. 7). In addition to limiting the definition of rape to a crime against a woman, this code was also very narrow because:
It did not acknowledge rape within marriage or co-habiting couples.
It focused on the victim’s consent rather than the perpetrator’s forcible conduct.
Moreover, the MPC established a grading system for the rape and similar offenses.
For example, it stated that rape by a voluntary social companion was a less serious offense than rape by a stranger. In addition, it treated the rape of men as a lesser felony than the rape of women.
In the 1970s and 1980s, extensive rape reform legislation was enacted throughout the country. And the legal definition of rape dramatically changed. Michigan’s 1975 Criminal Sexual Conduct Statute, became the national model for an expanded definition of rape. Today, Illinois’ Criminal Sexual Assault Statute is considered the national model (Epstein & Langenbahn, 1994, p. 8). Both statutes broadly define rape to include:
Gender neutrality, broadening earlier definitions of rape to include men.
Acts of sexual penetration other than vaginal penetration by a penis.
Distinguishing sexual abuse by the degree of force or threat of force used. That issimilar to the “aggravated vs. simple” distinction applied to physical assaults.
Threats, as well as overt force, are recognized as means of overpowering victims.
Taking advantage of an incapacitated victim. This includes mental illness, victims under the influence of drugs and alcohol. Some states require that perpetrators give victims intoxicants to obtain sexual access.)
The Federal Definition of Rape
Despite these legislative changes, much of the debate that exists today about what constitutes sexual assault and rape stems from how rape should be defined (Crowell & Burgess, 1996).
For purposes of this chapter, rape and other forms of sexual assault are defined using the Federal Criminal Code (Title 18, Chapter 109A, Sections 2241-2233). Although criminal statutes regarding rape differ somewhat state-to-state, the Federal Code is national.
For example, in addition to incorporating the reform provisions discussed above — gender neutrality and a broad definition of sexual abuse acts — the Federal Criminal Code:
Distinguishes between types of sexual abuse on the basis of the degree of force or threat of force used.
Does not use the term “rape,” and does not require the victim to label the act as rape to meet the elements of the crime.
The 1986 federal statute defines two types sexual assault:
Sexual abuse
Aggravated sexual abuse
Aggravated Sexual Abuse
Aggravated Sexual Abuse by Force or Threat of Force: When a person knowingly causes another person to engage in a sexual act… or attempts to do so by using force against that person, or by threatening or placing that person in fear that that person will be subjected to death, serious bodily injury, or kidnapping.
Aggravated Sexual Abuse by Other Means: When a person knowingly renders another person unconscious and thereby engages in a sexual act with that other person; or administers to another person by force or threat of force, or without the knowledge or permission of that person, a drug, intoxicant, or other similar substance and thereby:
a) Substantially impairs the ability of that person to appraise or control conduct
b) Engages in a sexual act with that person
Aggravated Sexual Abuse with a Child: When a person knowingly engages in a sexual act with another person who has not attained the age of twelve years, or attempts to do so.
The definition for aggravated sexual abuse by force or threat of force is analogous to what is usually called forcible rape. Aggravated sexual abuse with children is a serious form of what is generally called statutory rape. However, aggravated sexual abuse by other means is a type of non forcible rape for which the perpetrator “shall be fined . . . imprisoned for any term of years or life, or both.”
Sexual Abuse
The Federal Criminal Code definition of sexual abuse includes:
Causing another person to engage in a sexual activity by threatening or placing that person in fear.
Engaging in a sexual act if that person is incapable of declining participation in, or communicating unwillingness to engage in that sexual act.
Abusive Sexual Contact is defined as “when no sexual penetration actually occurred but when the intentional touching…of the genitalia, anus, groin, breast, inner thigh, or buttocks of any person with an intent to abuse, humiliate, harass, degrade, or arouse or gratify the sexual desire of any person occurs.”
Sexual Abuse of a Minor or Ward is defined as “knowingly engaging in a sexual act with a person between the ages of 12 and 15 years. (For additional information on sexual crimes against children, see the chapter on child victims).
Implications of Definitions
While great reforms have been made, the statute-based definitions for sex crimes fall short. They are lacking in the following areas:
The victim’s state of mind at the time of the crime, such as fear of death or serious bodily harm; and the victim’s crime-related physical and psychological injuries.
The types of unwanted sexual acts involved, the types of force or the coercion used, and the ages of victims and perpetrators.
Measuring Rape and Other Types of Sexual Assault
Estimates of the number of rapes and/or the number of women who have been raped differ because the sources of these estimates use different samples, different definitions of rape, different time frames of measurement, different ways of measuring whether a rape has happened, and different units of analysis in reporting statistics.
The difference between rape cases and rape victims is that women can be raped more than once.
There is a difference between the incidence of rape and the prevalence of rape. Incidence generally refers to the number of cases that occur in a given time period (usually a year), and incidence statistics are often reported as rates (e.g., the number of rape cases occurring per 100,000 women in the population).
Prevalence generally refers to the percentage of women who have been raped in a specified time period (e.g., within the past year or throughout their lifetime).
There is clearly a difference between estimates based on reported vs. nonreported cases. Fourth, estimates of rape come from two basic types of sources: 1) government sources 2) studies conducted by private researchers funded by federal grants.
With respect to government sources, the FBI Uniform Crime Reports (UCR) provides data on an annual basis only on the number of rapes and attempted rapes that were reported to US law enforcement that year. As noted by Crowell and Burgess (1996), another limitation of the UCR is that it uses the narrow common-law definition of rape (i.e., a carnal knowledge [penile-vaginal penetration only] of a female forcibly and against her will), meaning that other types of rape defined by federal law are not reported.
The Bureau of Justice Statistics conducts the National Crime Victimization Survey (NCVS) each year to measure reported and unreported crime, including rape and other sexual assaults. Every six months, the NCVS interviews residents 12 years or older in approximately 50,000 randomly-selected households about crimes that happened since the last interview.
In addition to data about the number of rape cases each year and rape rates (i.e., number of cases per 10,000 women), the NCVS provides information about the percentage of cases reported to police and characteristics of cases. Because the NCVS is primarily measures the number of rapes per year among those 12 and older, it cannot measure rapes that occurred prior to the six-month reference period. Nor does it address children under age 12. Understandably, the NCVS and most other studies don’t measure rapes of homeless women.
There are three major nongovernmental studies that provide additional information about rape.
The National Women’s Study (NWS), funded by the National Institute of Drug Abuse: longitudinal survey of a national probability household sample of 4008 adult women who were assessed at baseline and at one and two year follow-ups. The NWS generated the influential Rape in America: A report to the nation (Kilpatrick, Edmunds, & Seymour, 1992) as well as a number of other peer reviewed scientific publications. The NWS measured rapes and other sexual assaults occurring throughout victims’ lifetime as well as new cases occurring to adult women during the follow-up period.
The National Violence Against Women Survey (NVAW), funded by the National Institute of Justice and the CDC: used similar methodology to that pioneered by the NWS and interviewed 8,000 adult women and 8005 adult men (Tjaden & Thoennes, 1998). Rape and sexual assault were measured using screening questions virtually identical to those used in the NWS. Like the NWS, the NVAW measured the lifetime prevalence of rape as well as rapes that occurred during the year prior to the interview.
The National Survey of Adolescents (NSA), funded by the National Institute of Justice: conducted interviews with a national household probability sample of adolescents age 12-17. These adolescents were interviewed about sexual assaults and other crimes that occurred throughout their lifetimes. Also, information was gathered about important characteristics of these sexual assault cases (Kilpatrick & Saunders, 1996) and about the mental health effect of such experiences.
National Information About the Scope and Key Characteristics of Rape Cases
Accurate information about rape cases and victims is necessary to ensure victims receive effective treatment and cases are thoroughly investigated and prosecuted. The best information comes from the surveys described above. These surveys are ideal because they include information about reported and unreported cases.
Only a small percentage of rape cases are reported to police, and it is critically important that we learn more about these cases and the victims. Prior to describing the scope and case characteristics data, it is important to consider the following:
Encouraging victims to report attacks to police is critically important because most rapists are recidivists who will continue to rape they are apprehended, prosecuted, and incarcerated.
It is extremely important to understand the extent of America’s sexual assault problem to properly address it.
Different types of sexual assault cases require different investigative and prosecutorial strategies to enhance the prospects of successful prosecution.
The size, funding, and staffing of law enforcement agencies in the US varies widely. A one-size-fits-all sexual assault protocol applicable across all jurisdictions does not exist.
Unreported Sexual Assault Cases
National research indicates that most sexual assaults are never reported to police. The best data on unreported crime comes from victimization surveys. The surveys interview representative samples of adults and/or adolescents asking if they have been victims and if they reported the crimes. Some surveys also ask why victims did not report these crimes.
At the national level, major victimization surveys suggest that most sexual assaults go unreported. The National Crime Victimization Survey, conducted each year by the U.S. Department of Justice, found that only 32% of sexual assault cases were reported to police in 1994. The Rape in America survey conducted as a part of the National Women’s Study found that only 16% of rape cases were reported to police or other authorities (Kilpatrick, Edmonds & Seymour, 1992). Data from the National Survey of Adolescents indicated that only 14.3% of sexual assault cases had been reported. Thus, these national studies indicate that somewhere between 14% and 32% of all sexual assaults or rapes are ever reported to police.
A study of nonincarcerated sex offenders conducted by Dr. Gene Abel and his colleagues found that 126 men admitted that they had raped. These 126 rapists had committed a total of 907 rapes involving 882 different victims. The average number of different victims per rapist was seven (Abel et al., 1987).
These findings suggest that unreported rape constitutes a serious public safety problem. The Scope of the Rape and Sexual Assault Problem
As was previously described in the Statistical Overview section, the NVAW produced an estimate that 14.8% of adult women in the U.S. had been raped sometime during their lives and that another 2.8% had been victims of an attempted rape (Tjaden & Thoennes, 1998). For adult men, comparable lifetime prevalence estimates for rape and attempted rape were 2.1% and 0.9% respectively. The NWS found that 12.7% of adult women had been victims of completed rape and 14.3% had been victims of other types of sexual assault. The National Survey of Adolescents estimated that 13.0% of female adolescents and 3.4% of male adolescents had been victims of a sexual assault at some point during their lives (Kilpatrick & Saunders, 1997).
Data from the NWS and NSA indicate that revictimization is a problem for women and adolescents. Thirty-nine percent of rape victims in the NWS had been raped more than once, and 41.7% of the adolescent victims said that they had been sexually assaulted more than once.
National Research on Rape
Due to myths, misconceptions and social attitudes about sex crimes, the National Victim Center, in partnership with the National Crime Victims Research and Treatment Center of the Medical University of South Carolina, published Rape in America: A Report to the Nation in 1992.
The report was based on The National Women’s Study — funded by the National Institute of Drug Abuse — a three-year longitudinal study of a national probability sample of 4,008 adult women, (age 18 or older), 2,008 of whom represent a cross section of all adult women and 2,000 of whom are an over sample of younger women between the ages of 18 and 34.
The study provided the first national empirical data about forcible rape of women in America:
Seven-tenths of one percent of all women surveyed had experienced a completed forcible rape in the past year. This means an estimated 683,000 adult American women who were raped during a twelve-month period.
Thirteen percent of women have been victims of at least one completed rape in their lifetimes.
Based on U.S. Census estimates of the number of adult women in America, one out of every eight adult women, or at least, 12.1 million American women, has been the victim of forcible rape sometime in her lifetime.
While 56%, or an estimated 6.8 million women experienced only one rape, 39%, or an estimated 4.7 million, were raped more than once; and five percent were unsure as to how many times they were raped.
Prior to this study, national information about rape was limited to data on reported rapes from the FBI Uniform Crime Reports or data from the Bureau of Justice Statistics, National Crime Survey (NCS) on reported and unreported rapes in the past year. The number of rapes per year in Rape in America was approximately five times higher than the Uniform Crime Reports or the NCS. Recently, the NCS has been redesigned amid concerns that it failed to detect a substantial proportion of rape cases.
Age of Rape Victims
The NWS found that “rape in America is a tragedy of youth,” with the majority of cases occurring during childhood and adolescence:
Twenty-nine percent of all forcible rapes occurred when the victim was less than 11 years old.
Another 32% occurred when the victim was between ages of 11-17.
Slightly more than one in five rapes (22%) occurred between the ages of 18-24.
Seven percent of rapes occurred between the ages of 25-29.
Only six percent of rapes occurred when the victim was older than 29 years old.
The NVAW Survey found:
21.6% of first or only rape cases experienced by women happened before age 12.
32.4% of such cases happened between the ages of 12 and 17.
29.4% happened between the ages of 18 and 24.
16.6% happened at age 25 or greater.
Note: The NWS data represent a breakdown of victim’s ages at the time of all rape cases; and the NVAW data are a breakdown of age at the time of first rape only.
The NSA also provides information about the age at time of 462 cases of sexual assault experienced by 12-17-year-old adolescents (Kilpatrick, 1996, from the Mouths of Victims paper).
29.9% had been assaulted before age 11.
16.3% between the ages of 11 and 12.
20.8% between the ages of 13 and 14.
20.8% between the ages of 15 and 16.
1.7% at age 17.
Note: In the remaining 8.7% of cases, victims were not sure or refused to provide age data.
Relationship of the Victim to the Offender
The NWS dispelled the common myth that most women are raped by strangers. For example:
Only 22% of rape victims were assaulted by someone they had never seen before or did not know well.
Nine percent of victims were raped by husbands or ex-husbands.
Eleven percent by fathers or stepfathers.
Ten percent by boyfriends or ex-boyfriends.
Sixteen percent by other relatives.
Twenty-nine percent by other non-relatives, such as friends and neighbors.
In addition to the data just presented, the NWS gathered information about new cases that happened to adult women during the two-year follow up period. This information on the 41 such cases provides excellent information about the breakdown for new rapes experienced by adult women (Kilpatrick, Resnick, Saunders, & Best, 1998) (Dohrenwend book chapter).
24.4% of offenders were strangers.
21.9% were husbands.
19.5% were boyfriends.
9.8% were other relatives.
9.8% were friends.
14.6% were other nonrelatives.
The NVAW survey used different categories for victim-perpetrator relationships but reported similar findings with respect to the types of perpetrators most prevalent in rape cases occurring after age of 18.
76% of perpetrators were intimate partners (i.e., current and former spouses, cohabiting partners, dates, and boyfriends/girlfriends).
16.8% were acquaintances.
14.1% were strangers.
8.6% were relatives other than spouses.
The NSA provides a different perspective because it provides data on cases during childhood and adolescence (Kilpatrick, 1996).
32.5% of perpetrators were identified as friends.
23.2% were strangers.
22.1% were relatives (fathers, stepfathers, brothers, sisters, grandparents, others).
18.1% were other nonrelatives known well by the victim.
Degree of Physical Injury
Another common misconception about rape is that most victims sustain serious physical injuries. Using lifetime cases from the NWS:
Over two-thirds (70%) of victims reported no physical injuries.
Only four percent sustained serious physical injuries.
Twenty-four percent received minor physical injuries.
Of considerable importance is that almost half of all rape victims (49%) described being fearful of serious injury or death during the rape.
Not surprisingly, the percentage of new rape cases (n=41) experienced by adult women in the NWS resulting in physical injuries was somewhat higher than cases that included childhood and adolescent rapes (Kilpatrick et al., 1998).
9.8% of victims reported serious physical injuries.
46.3% sustained minor injuries.
43.9% sustained no physical injuries.
58.5% said that they were fearful of serious injury of death.
The NVAW survey provides a detailed breakdown of physical injuries sustained and medical treatment of the recent cases of rapes women experienced since age 18.
31.5% of women sustained some physical injuries.
Only 35.6% of victims with injuries received medical treatment.
In the NSA, 85.5% of child and adolescent cases resulted in no physical injuries. Only 1.3% of victims reported serious injuries, and 11% reported minor injuries (Kilpatrick, 1996).
Implications of These Findings About the Scope and Characteristics of Rape for the Investigation and Prosecution of Rape Cases
Information from all of these sources provides compelling evidence that most rapes are committed by perpetrators who are known well by their victims. This has profound implications for how rape cases should be investigated and prosecuted. If most victims know the identity of their perpetrators, then the key investigative issue is not collecting evidence to identify the perpetrator. Instead, most cases will likely require evidence refuting claims by the alleged perpetrator that the sexual activity was consensual. Known perpetrators are unlikely to claim they were mistakenly identified as a defense because forensic examinations can conclusively link the perpetrator to the assault
Second, Susan Estrich (1987) notes that successful prosecution of rape cases often requires victims to produce evidence of physical injuries to prove that they did not consent.
The fact that the vast majority of rape victims do not sustain major physical injuries also has clear implications for investigation and prosecution. The first implication is that most victims will not exhibit overt physical injuries, causing many people to conclude the victim consented.
The second implication is that forensic examinations must focus on detecting evidence of physical injuries that are not consistent with consensual sexual activity. Law enforcement, prosecutors, and jurors need to be informed about these physical injury data.
This information indicates that most rapes and other sexual assaults involve relatively young victims – not adult women, as most people believe. This suggests that separate investigative protocols should be established for adult and child victims.
Implications for Sexual Assault Forensic Medical Examinations
In sexual assault cases, the victim’s body is the primary “crime scene.” The forensic medical examination is a critical part of evidence collection.
Based on the victim’s report of what sexual acts occurred, the forensic exam collects evidence from the victim’s body that can establish: 1) sexual activity occurred 2) that a given person committed the acts 3) the sexual act produces physical injuries consistent with forced sex.
The exam needs to collect evidence documenting that a sex act occurred to counter the defense that a suspect never had sex with the victim. The exam also needs to collect DNA or other evidence proving the named suspect committed the sexual act(s) in question. This evidence can be used to prove that the sexual act occurred and that the defendant was responsible for it.
The only remaining defense a suspect can use is a consent-defense. One of the few ways to counter a claim of consent is to collect evidence of physical injuries (to the vulva, vagina or anus) that are inconsistent with consensual sex.
Most sexual assault protocols for adult victims do not include state-of-the-art procedures for detecting physical injuries to the victim’s vulva, vagina, or anus. Fortunately, new technology exists that may greatly increase detection of physical injuries.
The colposcope is a standard tool used by gynecologists for the evaluation of microscopic cervical, vaginal, or vulvar disease. Using a colposcope, the vulva, vagina, cervix, and/or anus can be examined at magnifications over 30 times the actual size. This permits detection of tears, bruises, or abrasions invisible to the naked eye. Colposcopic examination provides a much more objective and sensitive way of seeing and documenting genital, anal, and other injuries in sexual assault victims.
Conventional rape exams without colposcopes typically report evidence of genital injuries in only 19%-28% of cases (Slaughter & Brown, 1992). However, examiners using colposcopes find evidence of genital trauma in up to 87% of cases (Slaughter & Brown, 1992).
Another important finding is that colposcopic examinations of women who have had recent consensual sexual intercourse do not find evidence of physical injury. Thus, the colposcope is not only capable of detecting physical injuries invisible to the naked eye, but a trained expert examiner can also testify that such injuries do not occur during consensual sex.
The ideal acute sexual assault exam protocol would have two parts:
The first part would be similar to the existing protocol, which is conducted within 72 hours of the assault. However, the protocol would be changed to include a colposcopic exam.
The second part of the protocol would include a second colposcopic exam conducted 4-6 weeks after the assault. The purpose is to collect evidence of a victim’s recovery from physical injuries detected during the first exam. That would provide evidence for an expert examiner to testify about recovery from injuries inconsistent with consensual sex.
A final advantage of the colposcope is that technology exists to take color photographs or make videotapes of the injuries detected. This documentation of injuries has been described as having a powerful impact on jurors. And defendants, who entered guilty pleas when confronted with this evidence.
The Need for a Comprehensive Approach
Improving the investigation and prosecution of rape cases cannot be accomplished by any single agency. At least two recent major reports strongly advocate interagency cooperation (Epstein, Langenhahn, 1994; National Victim Center, 1992). The National Victim Center Report, A Looking Back, Moving Forward: A Guidebook for Communities Responding to Sexual Assault, identified a number of agencies that should play a key role after an assault occurs.
These agencies and their roles are depicted in a figure contained in the above mentioned report (National Victim Center, 1992). This figure identifies roles for five types of agencies/disciplines in responding to sexual assaults:
Medical
Law Enforcement
Prosecution
Corrections
Victim Services
As the figure indicates, victims who report rapes to law enforcement will likely have contact with medical and victim service professionals as well as law enforcement. If an arrest is made, prosecution professionals become involved. If there is a conviction, then corrections becomes involved. The NVC report strongly advocates establishing community sexual assault interagency councils with representatives from these areas. The report also suggests these interagency councils should negotiate a multiagency protocol specifying how sexual assault cases should be handled.
Even though establishing an interagency council is difficult and may be impractical in some communities, the importance of cooperation cannot be overemphasized. Law enforcement is critically important, but law enforcement cannot succeed without the assistance and support of other agencies.
The US has numerous police and prosecutorial jurisdictions. No single policy will fit the needs of all jurisdictions. In large metropolitan areas or large departments, it might be feasible to develop sex crimes investigation units. This is not feasible in small jurisdictions. Likewise, large metropolitan areas have many law enforcement agencies as well as major medical centers, rape crisis centers, and other victim service agencies. Small law enforcement agencies are often in small towns or rural areas that lack ready access to medical centers and victim services. Large agencies often have victim advocates, but small agencies rarely do.
Even though victims’ needs and the elements of effective investigation and prosecution are the same regardless of jurisdiction, protocol should reflect the circumstances within different jurisdictions.
Reasons for Nonreporting and How to Increase Reporting
Why don’t victims report rapes to police?
According to a recent BJS report (1994), attempted crimes, and crimes that did not result in physical injuries were less likely to be reported to police than completed crimes or those producing injuries. Victims of violent crimes who reported said they did so to help prevent future acts of violence and because they thought it was the right thing to do. A primary reason for not reporting was a victim’s desire to maintain privacy.
The Rape in America report (Kilpatrick et al., 1992) included information relevant to why most victims are reluctant to report (see Figure 1). Major concerns identified by victims were: being blamed by others, their families finding out about the rape, other people findings out, and their names being made public by the news media.
A victim with these concerns would likely have substantial reservations about reporting the rape to police. However, it is reasonable to assume that addressing these concerns might encourage reporting.
A second part of the Rape in America report described the results of a national survey of 522 organizations that provided crisis-counseling services to adult victims, some of whom did not report to police. Representatives from these agencies provided a list of actions that would increase victims’ willingness to report rapes to police. Below are the actions and the percentage of agencies that thought each action would be effective.
Educate the public about acquaintance rape/99%
0Pass laws protecting confidentiality victims’ identity/97%
Expand counseling and advocacy services/97%
Provide mandatory HIV testing for indicted defendants/80%
Provide free pregnancy counseling and abortions/77%
Provide confidential, free testing for HIV and STDs/57%
Efforts to increase the reporting of rape cases must be as big a priority as effective processing of cases. This requires a great deal of public education about rape, especially acquaintance rape. It will also require ensuring victims have access to needed support services and that they know their privacy will be protected to the extent that is legally possible. It also requires a public education campaign stressing the importance of reporting all rapes.
References
Abel, G., Becker, J., Mittleman, M., Cunningham-Rathner, J., Rouleau, J., & Murphy, W. (1987). Self-reported sex crime of nonincarcerated paraphiliacs. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 2 (1), 3-25.
Bourque, L.B. (1989). Defining rape. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Bureau of Justice Statistics, (1998, Dec.) National Crime Victimization Survey. Washington, DC: Department of Justice.
Craven D. (1994). A sex differences in violent victimization, @ NCJ-164508, p.5. Bureau of Justice Statistics, Special Report. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
Crowell, N.A. & Burgess, A.W. (1996). Understanding violence against women. Washington, DC: National Academy of Press.
Epstein, J. & Langenbahn, S. (1994). The criminal justice and community response to rape. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.
Estrich, S. (1987). Real rape. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
Federal Bureau of Investigation Crime in the United States, Uniform Crime Reports, 1997, p. 26. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice.
Kilpatrick, D.G., Edmunds, C., Seymour, A. (1992). Rape in America: A report to the nation. Charleston, SC: National Victim Center & the Crime Victims Research and Treatment Center, Medical University of South Carolina.
Kilpatrick, D.G. (Nov. 1996). From the mouths of victims: What victimization surveys tell us about sexual assault and sex offenders. Paper presented at the Association for the Treatment of Sexual Abusers Meeting, Chicago, IL.
Kilpatrick, D.G. & Saunders, B.E. Prevalence and Consequences of Child Victmization: Results from the National Survey of Adolescents. 1996. U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, National Institute of Justice, Grant No. 93-IJ-CX-0023.
Kilpatrick, D.G. & Saunders, B.E. (April, 1997). The prevalence and consequences of child victimization. National Institute of Justice Research Preview. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice.
Kilpatrick, D.G., Acierno, R.E., Resnick, H.S., Saunders, B.E., & Best, C.L. (1997). A 2-year longitudinal analysis of the relationship between violent assault and substance use in women. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 65 (5), pp. 834-847.
Kilpatrick, D.G., Resnick, H.S., Saunders, B.E. & Best, C.L. (1998). Rape, other violence against women, and posttraumatic stress disorder: Critical issues in assessing the adversity-stress-psychopathology relationship. In B.P. Dohrenwend (Ed.), Adversity, Stress, & Psychopathology, pp. 161-176, New York: Oxford University Press.
Kilpatrick, D.G., Acierno, R., Saunders, B., Resnick, H., Best, C., & Schnurr, P. (2000). Risk factors for adolescent substance abuse and dependence: Data from a national survey. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 68 (1), pp. 19-30.
Koss, M.P. (1993). Detecting the scope of rape: A review of prevalence research methods. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 8, 198-222.
National Victim Center (1992). Sexual assault legislation. Infolink, 1 62.
National Victim Center (1992). Rape-related posttraumatic stress disorder. Infolink 1 (38). Arlington, VA: Author.
National Victim Center (1993). Looking back, moving forward: A guidebook for communities responding to sexual assault. Washington, DC: Sponsored by the Office for Victims of Crime, U.S. Department of Justice.
Perkins, C. (1997, Sept.). Age patterns of victims of serious crimes, NCJ-162031, p.1. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics, U.S. Department of Justice.
Resnick, H.S., Kilpatrick, D.G., Dansky, B.S., Saunders, B.E., & Best, C.L. (1993). Prevalence of civilian trauma and PTSD in a representative national sample of women. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 61, 984-991.
Ringel, C. (1997, Nov.). Criminal Victimization in 1996, Changes 1995-1996 with Trends 1993-1996. NCJ-165812, p.3. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics, U.S. Department of Justice.
Tjaden, P. & Thoennes, N. (1998, Nov.) A prevalence, incidence, and consequences of violence against women: Findings from the National Violence Against Women Survey, p. 2&5. Research in Brief. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice, U.S. Department of Justice.
there are also other good stats compiled and cited here.
http://www2.ucsc.edu/rape-prevention/statistics.html
here is the most alarming….
Women of all ethnicities are raped: American Indian/Alaska Native women are most likely to report a rape and Asian/Pacific Islander women the least likely. (National Institute of Justice 1998)
Reported rape victimization by race is: 34% of American Indian/Alaska Native; 24% women of mixed raceWomen with disabilities are raped and abused at twice the rate of the general population. (Sobsey 1994); 19% of African American women; 18% of white women; 8% of Asian/Pacific Islander women. (Tjaden and Thoennes, National Institute of Justice 1998)
80-90% of rapes against women (except for American Indian women) are committed by someone of the same racial background as the victim. (US Dept. of Justice 1994)
American Indian victims of rape reported the offender as either white or black in 90% of reports. (Department of Justice 1997)
This last one fully illustrates known jurisdictional gaps by perpetrators. If you could cross reference this data with location, I’m willing to hypothesize that those crimes happen in Indian Country. It makes our women targets due to lack of enforcement. As they say… Laws without consequences are just mere suggestions…
I would take issue with the legitimacy of the FBI stats.
here is an NPR article where a rape was reported at the hospital, and no investigation took place.
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=12203114
This is a horrible topic and one that we must investigate more and take action as needed. I do not mean any disrespect toward Ryan, but the vast majority of his references are over 5 years old (5 years being the maximum amount of time used to support statements in research studies). We also must consider the fact that studies can last for many years and then publication takes additional years, so the 5 year period in actuality could be several years more. Quoting statistics from the 1960s through 1990s, isn’t a valid way of supporting statements. In addition, this was about Native American women on reservations, yet much of the supporting references (including the National Womens Study) is about more than our Native American women, which makes the data inaccurate and invalid for the purpose of what we are discussing. (This is probably why there were questions about Ryan’s 1 out of 3 Native American women).
I do not mean to belittle such a horrid topic; I only mean to stress the importance of asking for references (thanks to Kelly M. Bray!) and critically evaluating the references and other material provided. As Native Americans, we can help both our Nations, the states we live in, and America resolve this issue. For the purposes of the recent Osage election and as an Osage voter, I am more concerned about how this affects our reservation, our Osage women. National statistics are all well and good, but when we are talking about topics for an election, the information should relate to those individuals. Cultural and environmental issues can make statistics different for each Nation. What is relevant to one, may not be to another. Why should we spend time and money trying to resolve an issue on Osage reservation that doesn’t exist? (Not saying this isn’t a worthwhile topic, but trying to stress the need for relevance. I’d be interested in knowing the statistics for our reservation).
Also, Ryan speaks of prosecuting non-Native American men who violate our women, yet this video discusses Native American men violating Native American women and children on reservations. This is an opportunity for us, as Native Americans, to set the standard for the 50 states and the federal government. The complaints Native American women had, i.e., no help from police, protection orders meaning nothing, is something that affects all women, regardless of race or culture. If our people could obtain statistics pertaining to each reservation, we could develop programs based on the needs of each nation, establish intolerance laws, enforce those laws, and prosecute perpetrators.
Kelly, with all due respect if you are aware of a way that this data can be compiled here please let me know. I say this for two reasons
1. As mentioned before, we need forensic rape units at IHS (SANE). If anyone was to know about what support units were in place to for our women here (in pawhuska or surrounding areas) it would be Louis and as I was corrected early on, he was advocating on this same issue, so with out further information tracking down, I have to assume it’s lacking.
2. I have been told that our police dept does not make reports. I have no idea if this is true or not but it was relayed to me by a group that was trying to remove a ‘party house’ of non-osage renters from the Pawhuska Indian Village and they requested the past police reports from everytime they had been called out there previously. They were informed that there were none. If this is true, it represents another gap in the law where essentially nothing is going to happen.
While, the 1 in 3 information appears to be old, it is the same statistic being repeated by this film (recent) and by our US Congressmen and Senators at the forum I attended in Denver in 2007. So I don’t know if they are all quoting the same study or newer studies. And Kelly to be honest, if I took inventory of the women I know here this number holds up. (and those are just my closer friends who have confided in me) With all due respect, I know you are just requesting better references but I don’t need a national survey to tell me this is or is not a problem here.
And you are correct. The Indian on Indian crime is bad as well but its a matter of some jurisdiction vs. NO jurisdiction when comparing the Native cases to the White perp. cases.
Ryan,
I hope you realize I definitely meant no disrespect in my post toward you or anyone else. I am one who prefers facts when I read any form of accusations. I tend not to be one to take what I am told as fact until I have either personally investigated it or have valid proof. This is why I asked for more current data or data that pertained to Osage women.
For the record, I believe all hospitals should have rape kits; I also believe our women are raped and have been raped and violated for decades. (I cannot support my belief and would not expect laws, etc. to change simply because of my belief). I agree that we don’t need a national survey to know the problem exists; however, knowing to what extent it exists and who the perps are (not meaning names), locations, etc. helps to support requests for assistance/action. It is a matter of whether one wants to lead, follow, or support an issue based on emotion or critical thinking.
From your response, it appears no studies have been conducted for the Osage Reservation or validation of accusations. My area of concentration is juvenile psychopathology, which may touch on this area, but only as it pertains to youth. This topic would definitely be of great value to resolving crimes against Osage women if there was someone who either (1) had the time and resources to conduct a valid, reliable study of Osage women living on Osage land (county) and their rape experience(s) or (2) needed a topic for their dissertation. However, one of the first places I would suggest starting at is with our law enforcement. I say this because, although we may get rape kits at IHS, we need the support of law enforcement and the legal system. If the statement you made about our law enforcement is correct, it seems we must first strive to correct the department’s failure to document reports and follow up on those reports. Lots of accusations occur when there are elections, when people don’t particularly like an individual(s), and when someone wants what another person has. I am not implying that is the case, but conducting valid studies (whether it be local, county, state, or national) helps to ensure biases and prejudices are minimalized.
Please educate me on this: you mentioned some jurisdiction vs. no jurisdiction. Do you mean that our law enforcement/legal system has no jurisdiction over our villages in Pawhuska, etc. or do you mean our law enforcement/legal system has no jurisdiction over Whites on our land? (For the purpose of this discussion, when I say our land, I am referring to our villages). I no longer live in Osage county. I recall when I came home on leave while in the military, I was told we had collaborated with local law enforcement to assist us and us them when crimes were committed. Was this ever the case and do you believe that plays a role in the problem?
To my knowledge non-Indians will not be prosecuted for any crimes committed on trust land or the villages unless it is pursued by the federal govt which takes very little interest in these cases. I heard a us congressman say that only 1% cases of capital murder cases are taken up by the federal govt on indian land. I have tried to look up a similar stat but have not found anything to match that stat. However the numbers I did locate on that matter were still pitifully low.
our law enforcement has been cross deputized…however I don’t think that has been tested in the courts… so it begs the question…
if i catch a non indian breaking into my house…what should i do? detain that individual? if you hand him over to law enforcement he would just be let go. If I keep him/her I could be theoretically charged with kidnapping…
this is a huge gap, and is highly problematic. most of the things we are complaining about are felonies.. if its a misdemeanor… the chances of something happening probably near the 0% mark.